Professional Ethics

1 . Case : Dr . Conrad Hadenuf has been a indorsed psychologist for 20 days and has ever so maintained a busy utilize . He sees a wide variety of clients . As a configuration of permit renewal , he is ask to attend a 15 hour retraining program o signification iniquity . He is indignant . `I have a Ph .D , I have 3 ,000 hours of supervised experienced , and I have years of experience with all sorts of problems , he says . `This is provided a money-making gimmick for those who penury to generate workshops !` cognise that he has no choice if he wants to retain his license , Conrad grudgingly attends the workshop , sits in the back of the room , takes no nones , takes long-dated breaks the scheduled , and leaves soon as the certificates of attendance atomic spell 18 available-Do you think it is good to remain practicing if you do non stay on your teaching ? Why or wherefore notIt is unimpeachably not ethical to continue practicing if the master does not continue his /her reading as mandated by the justness . The law has stipulated this prerequisite for some(prenominal) significant and crucial reasons The professional has to go through this in for him /her to be reminded of the changes that be sure to have occurred in the employment of his /her profession from the amendments of existing laws , and notifications of offenses that are becoming common and how to shutdown out or avoid this to happen to the licensed psychologist . In Dr . Hadenuf s slip-up , his behavior during the program is considered an affront to the standards and what are so-called to be upheld in the practice . When a practitioner does not harmonize with what has been provided by the law , as in this occurrence study , that person has violated the ethics of the practice in dissimilar ways .

The person shows that he /she does not note the law , the needs that are obviously being intercommunicate why this law is still being implemented , and sets antecedence on other amateur individual practitioners to follow-Should evidence of continuing education be required (or simply strongly recommended ) as a basis for recertification or relicensureEvidence of continuing education should be required and not just strongly recommended for every professional as basis for recertification or relicensure . As stated in the precedent statements , there are strong realistic , hardheaded and ethical reasons why this is required to all who are in the practice . It will be presumptive for any body , no bet his peak and accomplishments , to maintain that he /she has no need of such . It is a healthy and significant assumption that all slew in whatever professional endeavor go through decline and compromises and constant reminder , refresher on his practice moldiness substantiate these occasions-What kind of continuing education would you want for yourself ? finished what means do you think you can take up sweep up new skills and keep abreast of advances in your field2 . Go to hypertext transfer protocol /www .tcada .state .tx .us /sanctions /counselor .shtml-Of those , what are the...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper