Contingency Theory

CONTINGENCY THEORY Two points of thought: Jay Galbraith (1973) Lawrence & angstrom unit; Lorsch (1967) Galbraith views:         The great the chore doubtfulness, the greater the number of in lineation that must be touch among decision makers during labor executions in order to chance upon a given aim of performance. 3 Assumptions: 1. in that respect is no one outgo mood to ordinate 2. either government agency of organizing is not evenly effective 3. The best way to organize depends on the character of the environment to which the organization relates (Organization form matters). Lawrence & Lorsch         Came up with mishap Theory They argued that different environments congeal differing requirements on organizations; specifically, environments characterized by uncertainty and rapid rates of compound in market conditions or technologies present different demands--both constraints and opportunities. They conducted studies of organizations in the plastics, fodder working, and standardized container industries. value the relation amongst their environments (high/ pathetic uncertainty) and the congenital features of each organization. Weicks Model of Organizing Focuses on the tender mental level. The focus of our direction should be organizing.

Weicks defination of Organizing: The firmness of equivocality in an enacted environment by means of interlocked behaviors embedded in conditionally related process Interlocked behaviors consist of: Repetitive, Reciprocal, Contingent behaviors (behaviors that contrive and argon maintained between 2 or to a greater extent actors). devising Sense common sense decisions gives rise to a repertoire of repeated routines and patterns of interaction which constitute the process of organizing. If you demand to disembowel a climb essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper