Frankenstein When I first saw the movie Frankenstein, I established that Hollywood was still changing the classic novels. In their general fashion, they changed the names of the characters to be somewhat pleasing to the audience. I imagine Henry Frankenstein was a better wholesome name than superior Frankenstein. Instead they saved the name Victor for the supporting agent because no one would care what they named him. Next they changed Elizabeth to Margaret for some mysterious reason. By movie standards today, the hulk looked like a macrocosm in bad makeup and stiff acting.
In bloody shame Shelley?s original interpretation, I envision a monster with pale Caucasian skin color, misshapen limbs and with more vocabularies than Ugh or Ahh. I have come to the realization that the 1931 movie brushup of Frankenstein and I share the same opinions for the movie. Though I did meet the acting and the makeup mediocre, in 1931 it was as the film connoisseur said, ?the most effective of its kind.? The background...If you want to get a full-of-the-moon essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.