Conflict Theory and Labeling Theory

The complaisant conflict supposition of crime maintains that a small group of richesy and in good order persons control not only the majority of resources in hunting lodge but also social institutions that reinforce the power and wealth of the status quo at the expense of less powerful groups. This leads to inequalities that be inherent in such a class oriented system in the view of liberals, but bourgeoiss see these inequalities as the natural outcome of differences in abilities or skills among people. As conservative political analyst George Will wrote, "poverty is simply the lead of too many black babies and too many arrogant Black men" among African Americans (Spriggs, 2006, p. 14). It is this historical difference that informs and shapes society's retort to wicked behavior where both blockion and punishment is concerned. For example, conservatives choose stiff sentences for drug offenders whereas liberals promote prevention and rehabilitation programs.

friendly conflict scheme maintains that deviance (crime, suicide, etc.) rig outs when a gap exists between the rewards held out by the status quo as attainable and the defence mechanism of access to routes of attaining those rewards for subgroups in society. As Brown, Esbensen, and Geis (2001) explain, " skirmish theorists believe that norms do not reflect a consensus of society to protect the community

Labeling possibleness takes a different go up to crime than conflict theory. Instead of focusing on the inequalities that arise from a specific amount of resources being available to society, labeling theory focuses on the self-fulfilling prophecy that arises for those who are termed criminals. Once a soul is arrested, prosecuted, and punished they are labeled a "criminal." When this occurs, there is a significant likelihood that the individual will subsequently endue more crimes when released into society.

This is for three primary flat coats: 1) tagged a criminal the individual will face trouble finding " real" employment; 2) Conventional people may shun an individual labeled a "criminal," forcing the criminal to associated with other criminals only; and 3) Labeled individuals may come to see themselves as criminals and "act in accord with this concept" (Crime, 2009, p. 1). In this sense, it is actually the methods of trying to prevent crime and punish criminals that are the cause of crime from the labeling theory perspective. Whereas conflict theory views limited resources as the cause of crime, labeling theory explores how the social environment causes individuals to engage in crime.

Spriggs, W.E. (2006). Poverty in America: The poor are getting poorer." The New Crisis, 113(1), 14-19.

Conflict theory, in contrast, does seem to offer a plausible reason for the cause of crime and seems best in explaining why typically marginalized groups in society like the poor and African Americans countenance the steepest rates of crime. Since these groups often live in poverty and high crime neighborhoods where legitimate opportunities for advancement are few if any, it is comprehensible how many individuals might view criminal behavior as the only means of acquiring some of the vast resources disproportionately held by a few at the top of the social strata. Despite this difference between them, both co
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!