Is It Harder To Prove A Hypothesis Than To Disprove It? Imagine You Wanted To Establish That Cheetahs Are The Fastest Land Animals, And Assume You Have The Ability To Clock Any Animal Moving At Its Top Speed. Now, What Would It Take To Disprove The Idea T

Running Head : PROVE OR DISPROVE A HYPOTHESISIs it Harder to Prove a Hypothesis than to Disprove It (Author (UniversityIs it Harder to Prove a Hypothesis than to Disprove ItA possibility is a statement that gives score or generalization about certain facts or rationale , from which a basis for possible set of experiments to confirm it dope be formed . It potbelly never be turn up true but in some representations it can be verified by certain scientific or theoretical approach (The American inheritance Science , 2005 . thus , a surmise can either be accept or rejected depending on the results or data collected through the experiment . Given this , which is more difficult to do , prove a surmisal or the other way aroundIn to know this , lets us use an accepted hypothesis that the cheetahs argon the fastest land animals on cosmos . To prove this , we should carry on an experiment , say , by measuring the speed of the entire land animal on earth . Having the results , comp atomic number 18 all in all their speed . To further confirm it , the experiment should be repeated many fourth dimensions . In addition to that , the result should make with that of the others that conduct the same experiment . In doing so , sensation is establishing repeatability and credibility of facts self-possessed . Then after all that experiments , you atomic number 18 able to prove your hypothesis . How about disproving itIn my opinion , doing this is practically difficult to do . The obstacle lies in the fact that this hypothesis , which is , cheetahs are the fastest land animal on earth is well established already . Disproving a hypothesis is standardized formulating a newfound wholeness but the additional difficulty is when the hypothesis being disproved , as mentioned , is a well-established one . integrity should also do an experiment in to gather bread and butter data for the claim . Another problem arises here . The time for a definite result to come out may take too long .

In addition do that , the claim should be consistent with other well-accepted hypothesis . In our cases , in disproving that cheetah is the fastest land animal , one should find laws or other hypothesis that may musical accompaniment this claimComparing the two cases , in proving a hypothesis , if it is a new one the main consideration here is the validity of the facts gathered Unlike in disproving a hypothesis , it also considers the hypothesis being disproved and also the validity of the facts gathered in disproving it . In other words , in disproving a hypothesis , you are considering two hypotheses , your own and the other one being disproveIn notice whether a hypothesis is harder to prove or disprove depends on the hypothesis itself . One should considered all the studies and laws that are related to the hypothesis . In this case of disproving a well-established hypothesis , disproving it is much harder . yet as mentioned , it all depends on the hypothesis itself ReferenceThe American Heritage Science (2005 . Hypothesis . Houghton Mifflin Company . RetrievedDecember 9 , 2007 from PAGEPAGE 4Prove and Disprove a Hypothesis...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper